Indexing metadata

Chapter 4: Negotiating parental/familial responsibility in genetic counselling


 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Chapter 4: Negotiating parental/familial responsibility in genetic counselling - Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Gøril Thomassen; Department of Language and communication studies, Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Norway
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Srikant Sarangi; Cardiff University; United Kingdom
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country John-Arne Skolbekken; Norwegian University of Science and Technology ;
 
3. Subject Discipline(s) Linguistics; Applied Linguistics
 
4. Subject Keyword(s) genetic counselling; genetic testing; genetic risk; dissemination of test results; parental/familial responsibility; decision-making; (non)directiveness
 
5. Subject Subject classification Discourse Studies; Pragmatics; Linguistics (CF); Discourse analysis (CFG)
 
6. Description Abstract The notion of responsibility is central in healthcare encounters, especially when it involves decisions about others, e.g., parents making decisions for children’s wellbeing. In the context of genetic counselling, given the familial basis of genetic disorders, decisions surrounding offer/uptake of genetic testing to determine the risk status of children become salient. Previous studies have shown that both genetic counsellors and parents routinely orient to others’ perspectives. Extending Pilnick’s (2001) finding that genetic counsellors allude to ‘what other people do’, Sarangi’s (2010) proposal which distinguishes between ‘family-others’ and ‘general-others’ vis-à-vis role-responsibility offers a useful framework to examine how parental/familial responsibility is contingently negotiated between genetic counsellors and parents. The data for the present study consist of 20 genetic counselling sessions within a hospital department of


medical genetics in Norway. The parents are either affected by cancer or at a high risk of inheriting cancer because of family history. Using discourse analysis we demonstrate how parental responsibility is framed and responded to differentially to cover genetic risk assessment, the testing process and the dissemination of test results. Our findings indicate that counsellors tend to be more directive about the process of decision making, which may amount to shifting attention from at-risk children to the parents themselves. We link our findings to the professional ethos of (non)directiveness in genetic counselling.
 
7. Publisher Organizing agency, location Equinox Publishing Ltd
 
8. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
9. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 22-Apr-2016
 
10. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
11. Type Type
 
12. Format File format PDF
 
13. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/books/article/view/26840
 
14. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.1558/equinox.26840
 
15. Source Journal/conference title; vol., no. (year) Equinox eBooks Publishing; Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings
 
16. Language English=en En
 
18. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
19. Rights Copyright and permissions Copyright 2014 Equinox Publishing Ltd