List of Figures
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | List of Figures - Framing Archaeology in the Near East |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Ianir Milevski ; Israel Antiquities Authority; |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Thomas Levy; University of California, San Diego; |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | Archaeology |
| 4. | Subject | Keyword(s) | social theory; archaeological theory |
| 5. | Subject | Subject classification | archaeology of the Anceint Near East |
| 6. | Description | Abstract | This volume presents a series of studies by scholars working in Middle Eastern archaeology who actively apply social theory to interpret their fieldwork. It aims to highlight the value of using social theory in the interpretation of field work in a region where, traditionally, such approaches have not played a major role. There are a number of factors that account for why social theory is often under-exploited by archaeologists in this part of the world. In many countries, where large numbers of the foreign archaeologists are involved, a division between those doing fieldwork and those undertaking archaeological interpretation can easily arise. Or, the lack of interest in social theory may stem from a legacy of positivism that overrides other approaches. There is also the fact that archaeology and anthropology often belong to separate academic departments and are considered two separate disciplines disconnected from each other. In some cases the centrality of historical paradigms has precluded the use of social theory. There are also divisions between universities and other research institutions, such as departments of antiquities, which is not conductive to interdisciplinary cooperation. This factor is especially debilitating in contexts of rapid destruction of sites and the exponential growth of salvage excavations and emergency surveys. The papers integrate a wide range of perspectives including ‘New’ or ‘Processual’ archaeology, Marxist, ‘Post-Processual’, evolutionist, cognitive, symbolic, and Cyber- archaeologies and touch on many topics including 3D representation, GIS, mapping and social theory, semiotics and linguistics, gender and bioarchaeology, social and technical identities, and modern historical modellingy and social practices in Middle Eastern archaeology. |
| 7. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Equinox Publishing Ltd |
| 8. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 9. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 20-Dec-2016 |
| 10. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 11. | Type | Type | |
| 12. | Format | File format | |
| 13. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/books/article/view/32609 |
| 14. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.1558/equinox.32609 |
| 15. | Source | Journal/conference title; vol., no. (year) | Equinox eBooks Publishing; Framing Archaeology in the Near East |
| 16. | Language | English=en | en |
| 18. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | Near East |
| 19. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright 2014 Equinox Publishing Ltd |