Criteria for a Response: Practicality
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Criteria for a Response: Practicality - Absolutization |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Robert Ellis; Middle Way Society; |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | Buddhist Studies; Philosophy |
| 4. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Buddhist studies; middle way; absolutisation; human judgement; Buddhist psychology; metaphysics; rationalisation; archetypes; mindfulness; mental health; repression |
| 5. | Subject | Subject classification | Buddhist Studies; Philosophy |
| 6. | Description | Abstract | a. What is Practicality? Practicality is a strength of Buddhist tradition and involves interconnected techniques, acknowledging embodiment and developing responsibility and effectiveness. Theory at a high level of generality can also be practical as long as it avoids absolutizing shortcuts. Restrictions in scope need to be provisional if they are not to detract from practicality, but academic specialization is often not seen provisionally. ‘Pragmatic’ philosophy has also lacked practicality, because of its representationalism, not distinguishing the meaning of ‘truth’ from belief in it. b. Embodiment To make our beliefs practical, our theories as well as our more immediate practical beliefs need to be scaled to human embodiment. This means adapting to our limited perspective by avoiding metaphysics – even though ‘saints’ may manage to maintain embodied beliefs in spite of the presence of metaphysical beliefs. It also means adapting to our limited capacities by avoiding both freewill (total responsibility) and determinism (zero responsibility) assumptions. c. Responsibility Responsibility can have both a ‘felt’ sense and a sense we are socially held to, but the former is needed (separated from law) as an aspect of our practical response to absolutization. Felt responsibility integrates and motivates, though it may need prompting by reminders. It applies not only to values, but to our interpretations of facts, the definitions of terms and our mental states. In all these ways we can avoid absolutizing dualities by developing felt responsibility. d. Effectiveness Absolutization may temporarily boost the intensity of our goal-directed action, but even that intensity is reduced by conflict. The more complex our activity the more direction rather than intensity becomes important, and the more absolutization interferes with that directionality, especially over time. In response, we need to develop genuine confidence, which arises from organic practice in embodied judgements in a varied environment, not from absolutized belief. |
| 7. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Equinox Publishing Ltd |
| 8. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 9. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 07-Oct-2022 |
| 10. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 11. | Type | Type | |
| 12. | Format | File format | |
| 13. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/books/article/view/44330 |
| 14. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.1558/equinox.44330 |
| 15. | Source | Journal/conference title; vol., no. (year) | Equinox eBooks Publishing; Absolutization |
| 16. | Language | English=en | en |
| 18. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 19. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright 2014 Equinox Publishing Ltd |