Sufism, Pluralism and Democracy - Clinton Bennett

Sufism, Pluralism and Democracy - Clinton Bennett

6. Sufis as Shapers of Pluralist Political Culture: The Examples of Bangladesh and Indonesia

Sufism, Pluralism and Democracy - Clinton Bennett

Clinton Bennett [+-]
State University of New York, New Palz
Clinton Bennett divides his teaching between SUNY New Paltz, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY and Cambridge, UK. He is a Fellow of the Royal Asiatic Society and the Royal Anthropological Institute. A Baptist missionary in Bangladesh 1979-1982, he maintains close personal and professional ties with South Asia. Director of interfaith relations for the British Council of Churches 1986-1992, he has served on not-for-profit management committees, local, national and international ecumenical agencies, chaired a school governing body and represented an NGO at the UN.   He has written ten books, numerous articles, reviews, chapters, editorials, and encyclopedia and dictionary entries. He is editor of the Continuum Studying World Religions series.

Description

Without denying distinctive features, Bangladesh and Indonesia, as majority Muslims states, share many common features. The way that Sufi Islam led peaceful proselytization in both contexts, fusing Islam and local spiritual and cultural traditions, is remarkable similar. In both states, reformist expressions of Islam have found much in these localized versions of Islam to criticize or condemn as deviant; Islamist parties and movements have challenged the dominant ethos of religious pluralism and political inclusivity. In both, this has tended to juxtapose a supposedly more pure, Arab-informed version of Islam and localized Islam. Both states have had periods of military rule but have recently experienced reasonably healthy democratic restorations. In some respects, Bangladesh, the younger state, has looked to Indonesia as a model. In both, women have held or hold high political office. In both, political parties range from secular (by name or pragmatically), through Islamic to Islamist. At least one party in each has Sufi links. In Indonesia, a Sufi leader served as President, even though he proved unequal to the task. In both, over the past decade, Islamists have performed badly at the polls, suggesting that Sufi inclined Muslims have succeeded in challenging their ideology and agenda, while in Indonesia Islamist parties appear to be shifting to the center, affirming pluralism, abandoning demands for Islamic systems in favor of policies and legislation informed by Islamic values, the Islamic-oriented option. This chapter critiques the view that Bangladeshi and Indonesian flavored Islam are any less authentic than any other expression of Islam, and suggests that these tap into Islamic principles and potentialities toward democratic and religious pluralism from which others can benefit.

Notify A Colleague

Citation

Bennett, Clinton. 6. Sufis as Shapers of Pluralist Political Culture: The Examples of Bangladesh and Indonesia. Sufism, Pluralism and Democracy. Equinox eBooks Publishing, United Kingdom. p. 121-146 Jul 2017. ISBN 9781781792216. https://www.equinoxpub.com/home/view-chapter/?id=27388. Date accessed: 21 Aug 2019 doi: 10.1558/equinox.27388. Jul 2017

Dublin Core Metadata